There are various theories discussed and formed to understand the
development of humans. One of the dominant theories among these theories is
Behaviorism. From the work of a psychologist named John B. Watson, in around
1870s, the behaviorism was originated (Coon, 2005). He was impressed by
the work of Ivan Pavlov and was influenced by him. Before his experiments and
notion came into existence, psychologists were concerned with the development
of mind and mental processes. However, he opposed to this view and strongly
believed that psychology should not be concerned with how mind and mental
processes work, instead psychology should be concerned with behavior. He believed that we need something stable,
something that can be measured to understand the human development (Cohen, 2009). That prospect that
could be measured according to him was the behavior of human. Thereby this
notion of human development was formed. The main argument of behaviorists is
that behavior should be studied because it could be dealt directly. It is
something we could see and measure. However, mind and mental processes in the
psychology should be ignored since it could not be dealt directly. It is something
which could result in inconsistency (Henton & Iversen, 2011). Behaviorism
emphasized the importance of psychologists studying only the observable
behavior. One of the proponents of this theory was B.F.Skinner, whose experiment
was named as Operant Conditioning. He believed that behavior can be
conditioned. His experiment on Operant Conditioning will be further discussed
by giving a brief to his experiment and his principles, positive reinforcement,
negative reinforcement and punishment. Furthermore, the relationship between
different developmental stages and learning through Operant Conditioning would
be discussed and also how to apply this to the classroom will be examined.
0 comments:
Post a Comment